swsusp memory freeing [was Re: swsusp: allow resume from initramfs]

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > By the way, did you see the effect of the memory eating patch? I didn't
> > > think about it until someone emailed me, but the improvement was 50x
> > > speed in the best case!
> > 
> > Well, more interesting was that you actually freed much more memory
> > with your patch. *You actually made memory freeing to work*. So yes, I
> > like that one.
> 
> You might be misreading me. When you set the image size limit setting in
> Suspend2, it's a soft limit. The image size wouldn't actually get down
> to 2 meg; Suspend would just aim for that and eat memory until it saw it
> wasn't getting anywhere.

Well, numbers looked like with same 2MB soft limit, "new" version
actually freed more memory. Perhaps that's not the case...
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/