[patch 4/4] arm/cpu-sa1110: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

[domen]

Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. Neither signals nor wait-queue events are important at this
point in the code, I believe.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


 kj-domen/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c~msleep-arch_arm_mach-sa1100_cpu-sa1110 arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
--- kj/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c~msleep-arch_arm_mach-sa1100_cpu-sa1110	2005-03-05 16:10:43.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c	2005-03-05 16:10:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_
 	 */
 	sdram_set_refresh(2);
 	if (!irqs_disabled()) {
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000);
+		msleep(20);
 	} else {
 		mdelay(20);
 	}
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/