Re: [8/many] acrypto: crypto_dev.c

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:51:21 -0800
Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 02:14:31 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:40:52 -0800
> > Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:37:34 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > --- /tmp/empty/crypto_dev.c     1970-01-01 03:00:00.000000000 +0300
> > > > +++ ./acrypto/crypto_dev.c      2005-03-07 20:35:36.000000000 +0300
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
> > > > +/*
> > > > + *     crypto_dev.c
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +                       while (atomic_read(&__dev->refcnt)) {
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > > +                               set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > > +                               schedule_timeout(HZ);
> > >
> > > I don't see any wait-queues in the immediate area of this code. Can
> > > this be an ssleep(1)?
> > 
> > Yes, you are right, this loop just spins until all pending sessions
> > are removed from given crypto device, so it can just ssleep(1) here.
> 
> Would you like me to send an incremental patch or will you be changing
> it yourself?

That would be nice to see your changes in the acrypto.
If it will be commited...

> Thanks,
> Nish


	Evgeniy Polyakov

Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/