Re: [2.6 patch] better CRYPTO_AES <-> CRYPTO_AES_586 dependencies

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Tue Mar 08 2005 - 15:54:49 EST

Followup to: <20050225222938.GG3311@xxxxxxxxx>
By author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup:
> >
> > Wouldn't the 586 one also work on x86_64?
> I'd assume yes.
> But the CRYPTO_AES_586 were already this way, and since I don't know the
> history of these dependencies this isn't changed by my patch.

Anything written in assembly would have to be specifically adjusted to
work on x86-64 (different ABI, 64-bit pointers, etc.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at