Re: Linux 2.6.11.2

[Wakko Warner]

Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> >>>which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release.  If consensus arrives
> >>>that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >>>way in the future.
> >>
> >>IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt
> >>againt
> >>the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
> >
> >It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most 
> >logical to
> >me.
> 
> Well, yes, _if_ 2.6.12 patch is going to be to aply against 2.6.11.last 
> instead
> of 2.6.11. And, well, either one will cause great panic for hose who aren't 
> and
> the mailing lists and just visit kernel.org to downoad the latest stuff.

<mode="enduser">
IMHO, as long as 2.6.12 patches against 2.6.11, I'm cool with 2.6.11.2
patching against 2.6.11.1, but I think it should patch against 2.6.11
instead
</mode>

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/