Re: AGP bogosities

[David Lang]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > I'm fascinated that not a single person picked up on this problem
> > whilst the agp code sat in -mm. Even if DRI isn't enabled,
> > every box out there with AGP that uses the generic routines
> > (which is a majority), should have barfed loudly when it hit
> > this check during boot.  Does no-one read dmesg output any more ?
>
> Its way too long these days. Like "so long it overflows even enlarged
> buffer". We should prune these messages down to "one line per hw
> device or serious problems only".

especially if you turn on encryption options. I can understand that output 
being useful for debugging, but there should be a way to not deal with it 
in the normal case.

David Lang

--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
 -- C.A.R. Hoare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/