Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is not true, the auditing of read/write will work fine on the
> seccomp task too. I guess you overlooked something in the code.

yeah, you are right - it's there. You are driving seccomp off
do_syscall_trace(), which does audit_syscall_entry().

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/