Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI Express Advanced Error Reporting Driver

From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 18:06:49 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 04:12:18PM -0800, long was heard to remark:

> +void hw_aer_unregister(void)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *dev = (struct pci_dev*)host->dev;
> + unsigned short id;
> +
> + id = (dev->bus->number << 8) | dev->devfn;
> +
> + /* Unregister with AER Root driver */
> + pcie_aer_unregister(id);
> +}

I don't understand how this can work on a system with
more than one domain. On any midrange/high-end system,
you'll have a number of devices with identical values
for (bus->number << 8) | devfn)

For example, on my system, lspci prints out:

mosquito:~ # lspci
0000:00:01.0 Co-processor: IBM: Unknown device 00e0 (rev 01)
0000:00:03.0 ISA bridge: Symphony Labs W83C553 (rev 10)
0001:00:02.0 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0001:00:02.2 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0001:00:02.3 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0001:00:02.4 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0001:00:02.6 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0001:01:01.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1010
66MHz Ultra3 SCSI Adapter (rev 01)
0001:01:01.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1010
66MHz Ultra3 SCSI Adapter (rev 01)
0001:21:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro
100] (rev 0d)
0002:00:02.0 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0002:00:02.2 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0002:00:02.4 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)
0002:00:02.6 PCI bridge: IBM: Unknown device 0188 (rev 02)


Here, 'Unknown device' is actually an empty slot.

If I plugged the ethernet card in a few slots over, it would
show up as

0002:01:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro

and so it would have the exact same (bus->number << 8) | devfn)
as the scsi device.

Or am I being stupid/dense/all-of-the-above?

--linas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/