Re: Remaining u32 vs. pm_message_t fixes

[Russell King]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:24:52AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This fixes three remaining places where we put u32 (or worse
> suspend_state_t) into pm_message_t-sized box. As a bonus, PCI_D0 is
> used instead of constant 0. Please apply,

I suspect there's more than that still remaining.  Have you tried

$ grep suspend include/asm-arm -r

?

Also, what about include/linux/device.h's struct device_driver, for
platform device drivers ?

I think there's a significant amount of work still to be done with
the u32 -> pm_message_t conversion before you can even think about
changing pm_message_t to a struct.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/