Re: kprobe_handler should check pre_handler function

[William Cohen]

Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:10:32PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
>
> > I found kprobes expects there to be a pre_handler function in the 
> > structure. I was writing a probe that only needed a post_handler 
> > function, no pre_handler function. The probe was tracking the 
> > destinations of indirect calls and jumps, the probe needs to fire after 
> > the instruction single steps to get the target address. The probe 
> > crashed the machine because arch/i386/kernel/kprobe.c:kprobe_handler() 
> > blindly calls p->pre_handler().  There should be a check to verify that 
> > the pointer is non-null. There are cases where the pre_handler is not 
> > needed and it would make sense to set it to NULL. Thus, a check should 
> > be done for pre_handler like post_handler and fault_handler.
>
>
> You are right. The check for pre_handler is needed and here is a patch
> against 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 that does this.
>
> Thanks,
> Ananth

Ananth,

Thanks. It looks like it addresses the problem. Could you see about 
getting this patch in the upstream kernel?

-Will


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/