Re: no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Wed Mar 30 2005 - 01:19:26 EST

Next message: Yum Rayan: "Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel"
In reply to: Pekka J Enberg: "Re: no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/"
Next in thread: P Lavin: "Re: no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Pekka writes:
> It is not a performance issue, it's an API issue.
> ...
> I am all for profiling but it should not stop us from merging the patches

Ok - sounds right.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Yum Rayan: "Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel"
In reply to: Pekka J Enberg: "Re: no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/"
Next in thread: P Lavin: "Re: no need to check for NULL before calling kfree() -fs/ext2/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]