Re: [PATCH 3/3] Keys: Make request-key create an authorisation key

From: Benoit Boissinot
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 14:53:07 EST


On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:52:45 +0000, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The attached patch makes the following changes:
>
> (6) One of the process keyrings can be nominated as the default to which
> request_key() should attach new keys if not otherwise specified. This is
> done with KEYCTL_SET_REQKEY_KEYRING and one of the KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_*
> constants. The current setting can also be read using this call.
>
>
> Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> @@ -903,6 +922,44 @@ long keyctl_negate_key(key_serial_t id,
>
> /*****************************************************************************/
> /*
> + * set the default keyring in which request_key() will cache keys
> + * - return the old setting
> + */
> +long keyctl_set_reqkey_keyring(int reqkey_defl)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (reqkey_defl) {
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_THREAD_KEYRING:
> + ret = install_thread_keyring(current);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + goto set;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_PROCESS_KEYRING:
> + ret = install_process_keyring(current);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_DEFAULT:
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_SESSION_KEYRING:
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_KEYRING:
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_SESSION_KEYRING:
> + set:
> + current->jit_keyring = reqkey_defl;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_NO_CHANGE:
> + return current->jit_keyring;
> +
> + case KEY_SPEC_GROUP_KEYRING:

KEY_REQKEY_DEFL__GROUP_KEYRING

> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> +} /* end keyctl_set_reqkey_keyring() */
> +

> @@ -267,21 +294,84 @@ static struct key *request_key_construct
>
> /*****************************************************************************/
> /*
> + * link a freshly minted key to an appropriate destination keyring
> + */
> +static void request_key_link(struct key *key, struct key *dest_keyring)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> + struct key *drop = NULL;
> +
> + kenter("{%d},%p", key->serial, dest_keyring);
> +
> + /* find the appropriate keyring */
> + if (!dest_keyring) {
> + switch (tsk->jit_keyring) {
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_DEFAULT:
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_THREAD_KEYRING:
> + dest_keyring = tsk->thread_keyring;
> + if (dest_keyring)
> + break;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_PROCESS_KEYRING:
> + dest_keyring = tsk->signal->process_keyring;
> + if (dest_keyring)
> + break;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_SESSION_KEYRING:
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dest_keyring = key_get(
> + rcu_dereference(tsk->signal->session_keyring));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + drop = dest_keyring;
> +
> + if (dest_keyring)
> + break;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_SESSION_KEYRING:
> + dest_keyring = current->user->session_keyring;
> + break;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_KEYRING:
> + dest_keyring = current->user->uid_keyring;
> + break;
> +
> + case KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_NO_CHANGE:

gcc-4 warns about this (warning: case label value is less than minimum
value for type) and it shouldn't be in jit_keyring anyway.

> + case KEY_SPEC_GROUP_KEYRING:

KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_GROUP_KEYRING
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* and attach the key to it */
> + key_link(dest_keyring, key);

patch attached.

regards,

Benoit

Attachment: keys.patch
Description: Binary data