Re: [Patch] sched: remove unnecessary sched domains

[Nick Piggin]

Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:07:27PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > I was thinking we could fix that by running balance on fork/exec multiple
> > times from top to bottom level domains. I'll have to measure the cost of
> > doing that, because it may be worthwhile.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> BTW, why are we setting SD_BALANCE_FORK flag for NUMA domain on i386, ia64.
> This should be set only on x86_64 and that too not for Intel systems.

Mainly to see whether anyone reports regressions, and to exercise
the code a bit.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/