Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in arm

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > This fixes u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in arm. I was not able to
> > even compile it, but it should not cause any problems. Please apply,
> 
> On testing this patch, it doesn't build.  You need to include
> linux/pm.h into linux/sysdev.h for starters, and fix sysdev.h
> to also use pm_message_t in it's function pointers.
> 
> Therefore, I'd like the following patch either to be in mainline first,
> or in my ARM tree for Linus to pull so ARM doesn't completely break
> on my next merge.

That patch was recently merged into -mm, so I hope its okay... Thanks
for testing. (And sorry, I did not realize patches depend on each
other this way).

								Pavel

-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/