Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclearcopyright notice.

[Jeff Garzik]

Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:55:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:51:30AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Then let's see some acts.  We (lkml) are not the ones with the percieved
> > > > problem, or the ones discussing it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually, there are some legitimate problems with some of the files in
> > > the Linux source base.  Last time this came up, the Acenic firmware was
> > > mentioned:
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00078.html
> > >
> > > Seems to me that situation is still not resolved.
> >
> > And it looks like no one cares enough to make the effort to resolve this...
> >
> > I would love an open source acenic firmware.
>
>
> Yep, but in the meantime, let's clearly mark said firmware as
> not-covered-by-the-GPL. In the acenic case it seems to be even easier, as the
> firmware is in a separate acenic_firmware.h file, and it just needs to have
> the proper licencing statement added, saying that it is not covered by the
> GPL, and then giving the information under what licence it is being
> distributed.

Who has meaningfully contacted Alteon (probably "Neterion" now) about 
this?  What is the progress of that request?


> Jeff, since your name was found in the tg3.c case, and you seem to care about
> this too, what is your take on this proposal ?
>
> Friendly,

Bluntly, Debian is being a pain in the ass ;-)

There will always be non-free firmware to deal with, for key hardware.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/