Re: [08/08] uml: va_copy fix

[Blaisorblade]

On Wednesday 06 April 2005 14:04, Renate Meijer wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 April 2005 22:18:26 +0200, Renate Meijer wrote:

> >
> > You did read include/linux/compiler.h, didn't you?

> So instead of applying this patch, simply
>
> #ifdef VERSION_MINOR < WHATEVER
> #define va_copy __va_copy
> #endif
>
> in include/linux/compiler_gcc2.h
>
> Thus solving the problem without having to invade compiler namespace all
> over the place, but doing so in *one* place only.
About this one: thanks for suggesting this and being constructive, I'll do 
ASAP (if I don't forget) this for the -bk tree. However, I think that Greg KH 
for the stable tree would prefer a local tested patch rather than a global 
one with possible side effects, right Greg?

Also, I hope this discussion does not count as a vote for the -stable tree 
inclusion (since dropping GCC 2 support in the -stable tree is exactly the 
purpose of this tree, right ;-) ? ).
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/