Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclearcopyright notice.

[Humberto Massa]

David Schmitt wrote:

>  On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:25, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> > [snip] I got it from Alteon under a written agreement stating I
> > could distribute the image under the GPL. Since the firmware is
> > simply data to Linux, hence keeping it under the GPL should be just
> > fine.
>
>
>  Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the
>  source code for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting
>  with genfw.c which is mentioned in acenic_firmware.h) since - as far
>  as I know - firmware is coded today in VHDL, C or some assembler and
>  the days of hexcoding are long gone.

First, there is *NOT* any requirement in the GPL at all that requires 
making compilers available. Otherwise it would not be possible, for 
instance, have a Visual Basic GPL'd application. And yes, it is possible.

Second, up until the present day I have personal experience with 
hardware producers that do not have enough money to buy expensive 
toolchains and used a lot of hand-work to code hardware parameters. So, 
at least for them, hand-hexcoding-days are still going.

HTH,

Massa



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/