Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64

[Andi Kleen]

> Microbenchmark:
> ===============
> The microbenchmark was done in userspace with similar compile flags as
> used during kernel compile.
> Encrypt/decrypt is about 35% faster than the generic C implementation.
> As the generic C as well as my assembler implementation are both table
> driven I don't really expect that there is much room for further
> improvements though I'll be glad to be corrected here.

On what CPUs did you benchmark? I suppose results will vary a lot
between AMD and Intel x86-64 CPUs.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/