Re: [patch 130/198] ext2 corruption - regression between 2.6.9 and2.6.10

[Mingming Cao]

On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:22 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > The ext2 handle discard preallocation differently at that time, it discard the
> > preallocation at each iput(), not in input_final(), so we think it's
> > unnecessary to thrash it so frequently, and the right thing to do, as we did
> > for ext3 reservation, discard preallocation on last iput().  So we moved the
> > ext2_discard_preallocation from ext2_put_inode(0 to ext2_clear_inode.
> > 
> > Since ext2 preallocation is doing pre-allocation on disk, so it is possible
> > that at the unmount time, someone is still hold the reference of the inode, so
> > the preallocation for a file is not discard yet, so we still mark those blocks
> > allocated on disk, while they are not actually in the inode's block map, so
> > fsck will catch/fix that error later.
> > 
> > This is not a issue for ext3, as ext3 reservation(pre-allocation) is done in
> > memory.
> 
> Shouldn't we have a pass to discard on unmount instead?  ->put_inode is
> a really bad interface and all usages including this one are racy (not that
> it matters too much here, but I'd like to get rid of it eventually).

> As a band-aid to avoid the corruption it's certainly okay (and needed), but
> we should try to fix this for real.  Mingming, do you want to look into it
> or should I put it on my TODO list?
> 
> 
Hi Christoph,

I dislike the fact that ext2 discard preallocation on every iput rather
than the last iput.  Yes, I think doing a check of the preallocated
blocks at umount time is doable.  Please go for it. Thanks for asking.

Mingming

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/