Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets

[Paul Jackson]

Nick wrote:
> That would make sense. I'm not familiar with the workings of cpusets,
> but that would require every task to be assigned to one of these
> sets (or a subset within it), yes?

That's the rub, as I noted a couple of messages ago, while you
were writing this message.

It doesn't require every task to be in one of these or a subset.

Tasks could be in some multiple-domain superset, unless that is so
painful that we have to add mechanisms to cpusets to prohibit it.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/