Re: [PATCH] introduce generic 64bit rotations and i386 asm optimized version

[Domen Puncer]

On 19/04/05 15:46 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <200504190918.10279.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:18:10 +0300), Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > diff -urpN 2.6.12-rc2.1.be/include/linux/bitops.h 2.6.12-rc2.2.ror/include/linux/bitops.h
> > --- 2.6.12-rc2.1.be/include/linux/bitops.h	Mon Apr 18 22:55:10 2005
> > +++ 2.6.12-rc2.2.ror/include/linux/bitops.h	Tue Apr 19 00:25:28 2005
...
> > -static __inline__ int get_bitmask_order(unsigned int count)
> > +static inline int get_bitmask_order(unsigned int count)
> >  {
> >  	int order;
> >  	
> 
> Please keep using __inline__, not inline.

Why?

Couldn't find any threads about this, and even SubmittingPatches has:
"'static inline' is preferred over 'static __inline__'..."


	Domen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/