Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

[Ed Tomlinson]

On Friday 22 April 2005 20:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > Unfortunately first merge will make it practically unusable :-(. 
> 
> No, quite the reverse. If I merge from you, and you use my commit ID as 
> the "base" point, it will work again.
> 
> But yes, if you actually send the result as _patches_ to me, then the 
> commit objects I create will be totally separate from the commit objects 
> you had in your tree, and "git-export" will continue to export your old 
> stale entries since they won't show up as already being in my tree.
> 
> The point being, that there is a big difference between a proper merge 
> (with history etc merged) and just sending me the patches in your tree.

Using git patch, the output has the commit id.  Could this be used during
a merge of patches to record info that the source git could use to recognize
the changes as ones it originated (after a pull from the remote git which has
the merged patches)?

Ed Tomlinson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/