Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:23:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >If your theory is correct then it should be able to demonstrate this
> >problem without any special hardware at all: pin some user memory, then
> >generate memory pressure then check the contents of those pinned pages.
> 
> I tried that, but I couldn't get it to fail.  But that was a while ago, and 
> I've learned a few things since then, so I'll try again.
> 
> >But if, for the DMA transfer, you're using the array of page*'s which were
> >originally obtained from get_user_pages() then it's rather hard to see how
> >the kernel could alter the page's contents.
> >
> >Then again, if mlock() fixes it then something's up.  Very odd.
> 
> With mlock(), we don't need to use get_user_pages() at all.  Arjan tells me 
> the only time an mlocked page can move is with hot (un)plug of memory, but 
> that isn't supported on the systems that we support.

You don't "support" i386 or ia64 or x86-64 or ppc64 systems?  What
hardware do you support?  And what about the fact that you are aiming to
get this code into mainline, right?  If not, why are you asking here?
:)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/