Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix handling of no fpx_regs [critical, for2.6.12]

[Alexander Nyberg]

mån 2005-04-25 klockan 21:12 +0200 skrev blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx:
> From: Andree Leidenfrost <aleidenf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Fix the error path, which is triggered when the processor misses the fpx regs
> (i.e. the "fxsr" cpuinfo feature). For instance by VIA C3 Samuel2. Tested and
> obvious, please merge ASAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c |    7 ++++---
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c~uml-fix-no_fpx_regs_handling arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c
> --- linux-2.6.12/arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c~uml-fix-no_fpx_regs_handling	2005-04-25 21:03:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c	2005-04-25 21:08:07.000000000 +0200
> @@ -105,14 +105,15 @@ void init_registers(int pid)
>  		panic("check_ptrace : PTRACE_GETREGS failed, errno = %d",
>  		      err);
>  
> +	errno = 0;
>  	err = ptrace(PTRACE_GETFPXREGS, pid, 0, exec_fpx_regs);
>  	if(!err)
>  		return;
> +	if(errno != EIO)
> +		panic("check_ptrace : PTRACE_GETFPXREGS failed, errno = %d",
> +		      errno);

Looks like you mean "if (err != EIO)" here


>  	have_fpx_regs = 0;
> -	if(err != EIO)
> -		panic("check_ptrace : PTRACE_GETFPXREGS failed, errno = %d",
> -		      err);
>  
>  	err = ptrace(PTRACE_GETFPREGS, pid, 0, exec_fp_regs);
>  	if(err)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/