Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision numbernext.
From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Tue Apr 26 2005 - 11:53:41 EST
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:24:37 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:57:55 -0500
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Evgeniy,
> >
> > On 4/11/05, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > /*****************************************/
> > > Kernel Connector.
> > > /*****************************************/
> > ...
> > > +static int cn_call_callback(struct cn_msg *msg, void (*destruct_data) (void *), void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cn_callback_entry *__cbq;
> > > + struct cn_dev *dev = &cdev;
> > > + int found = 0;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_bh(&dev->cbdev->queue_lock);
> > > + list_for_each_entry(__cbq, &dev->cbdev->queue_list, callback_entry) {
> > > + if (cn_cb_equal(&__cbq->cb->id, &msg->id)) {
> > > + __cbq->cb->priv = msg;
> > > +
> > > + __cbq->ddata = data;
> > > + __cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
> > > +
> > > + queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work);
> >
> > It looks like there is a problem with the code. As far as I can see
> > there is only one cn_callback_entry associated with each callback. So,
> > if someone sends netlink messages with the same id at a high enough
> > rate (so cbdev's work queue does not get a chance to get scheduled and
> > process pending requests) ddata and the destructor will be overwritten
> > which can lead to memory leaks and non-delivery of some messages.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Connector needs to check return value here - zero means
> that work was already queued and we must free shared skb.
>
> There may not be the same work with different data.
Here is the patch:
* looking for johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/connector--main--0--patch-52 to compare with
* comparing to johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/connector--main--0--patch-52
M connector.c
* modified files
--- orig/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ mod/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@
__cbq->ddata = data;
__cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
- queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work);
- found = 1;
+ if (queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work))
+ found = 1;
break;
}
}
Evgeniy Polyakov
Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/