Re: preempt-count oddities - still looking for comments :)

[Jesper Juhl]

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Robert Love wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:31 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Replying to myself here since the initial mail got no response. Here's 
> > hoping that it showing up on the list again draws some comments :-)
> 
> I didn't think it was that big of a deal.  ;-)
> 
It's not really that big of a deal. I was just currious if I'd gotten it 
right since I spend a good deal of time digging for possible reasons for 
the differences (and finding none). :-)

> It seems the right approach.  Personally, I would of made the type an
> s32, since fixed-sizes seems to be sensible in the thread_info
> structure, but an int is the same thing.  Cool with me.
> 
I'll update the patch(es) then and use __s32 in the structure and s32 
elsewhere.

> Acked-by: Robert Love <rml@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
Thanks.

> 	Robert Love
> 

-- 
Jesper Juhl


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/