Re: del_timer_sync needed for UP RT systems.

[George Anzinger]

Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 17:14, George Anzinger wrote:
>
>
> > The problem here is that the reference is to timr, a pointer to something which 
> > has been deleted.  The memory may well be used elsewhere by this time which will 
> > make the test of it_process wrong.  It also means we could mess with someone 
> > elses memory in the memset above.
>
>
> Bottom line, you can use sys_timer_delete() on a timer, and trigger the
> same timer your deleting .. Those operations should be serialized, which
> they currently aren't .. 

I agree.  The change to do this is to use the del_timer_sync() or the 
del_singleshot_timer() code.

It is possible and desirable to be able to delete a running timer.  We don't 
want to take it away from the timer call back routine, however, as that leads to 
"bad things".  That is why these two del_* routines were written.
>
--
George Anzinger   george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/