Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS

[aq]

On 4/28/05, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:55:48PM +0900, aq wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > At the moment, the configuration interface of Filesystem is not very consistent:
> >
> > - All other filesystem configurations (like Reiserfs, JFS, ext3,...)
> > is in fs/Kconfig, but only XFS is in a separate file fs/xfs/Kconfig
> > - All other filesystem configuration is processed in the same screen
> > (using a kind of drop-down interface), but XFS configuration is done
> > in a separate screen.
> >
> > Here is the patch to fix the problem: it moves XFS configuration from
> > fs/xfs/Kconfig to fs/Kconfig, makes it to do all the configuration in
> > the same screen (by removing "menu" directive), and removes the
> > unnecessary fs/xfs/Kconfig.
> 
> The screen bits is fine, btu please keep fs/xfs/Kconfig.  It make maintaince
> a lot a easier for us XFS people.
> 
> 

I dont see why we should keep a file in kernel tree without using it
(since the patch removes "source xfs/Kconfig). Anyway, here is another
patch that doesnt remove fs/xfs/Kconfig.

Also note that this patch (and the last one, too) moves "config
XFS_EXPOR" to the bottom, so the menu intems aligns better and
consistently with others (like what Reiserfs, JFS,... are doing)

Andrew, please pick one of these two. Thank you.

# diffstat makefile.fs2.patch 
 Kconfig |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>\

Attachment: makefile.fs2.patch
Description: Binary data