Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386

[Blaisorblade]

On Thursday 28 April 2005 20:10, Chris Wright wrote:
> * blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx (blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Split the i386 entry.S files into entry.S and syscall_table.S which
> > is included in the previous one (so actually there is no difference
> > between them) and use the syscall_table.S in the UML build, instead of
> > tracking by hand the syscall table changes (which is inherently
> > error-prone).
>
> Xen can use this as well (it was on my todo list).
Yes, I had this idea too. So I guess this will be promptly merged, right?

-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/