Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking

[Mark Fasheh]

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:12AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Why don't you try it, and post the numbers?

*Sigh*

Done from a test machine I have over here on a two node cluster. 
I rebooted and re-formatted between tests.

* Without LKM_LOCAL:
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz 

real    0m39.699s
user    0m3.644s
sys     0m8.076s


* With LKM_LOCAL
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz 

real    0m22.076s
user    0m3.869s
sys     0m7.234s

So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/