Re: setitimer timer expires too early

[Olivier Croquette]

Nish Aravamudan wrote:

> Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out
> sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is
> going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so
> than currently), should not have issues like this.

What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in 
the present kernel?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/