Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/: possible cleanups
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 13:28:22 EST
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:24:16PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2005 01:57 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> > - make needlessly global functions static
> > - #if 0 the following unused global functions:
> > - journal.c: __journal_internal_check
> > /* Static check for data structure consistency. There's no code
> > * invoked --- we'll just get a linker failure if things aren't right.
> The comment above this function specifically says no code is generated
> here - the purpose of this function is to generate an error if the
> journal superblock is the wrong size (e.g. someone adds fields without
> updating the padding).
Ah, that's the part I didn't understand about it.
I still don't like this creating an empty global function.
What about moving it into one of the other functions (e.g.
> > - journal.c: journal_check_used_features
> I'm not aware of any current users of journal_check_used_features(), but
> the complementary function journal_check_available_features() IS used by
> ext3 and I can imagine that if we ever need to add some more journaling
> features it would be useful instead of mucking in the journal internals.
My patch changes it from a global EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed function to a static
If ext3 will ever require it undoing my change shouldn't be a problem.
> Cheers, Andreas
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/