Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
From: Bill Davidsen
Date: Tue May 03 2005 - 14:58:37 EST
Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said:
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
-#!/usr/bin/python
+#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
# v0.4b "oedipa maas"
Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what
env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal
behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.
Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call
results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it....
Assuming that he has env in a standard place... I hope this isn't going
to start some rash of efforts to make packages run on non-standard
toolchains, which add requirements for one tool to get around
misplacement of another.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/