RE: [patch 1/1] Proposed: Let's not waste precious IRQs...

[Protasevich, Natalie]

> 
> Hi Natalie,
> 
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 Natalie.Protasevich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > I suggest to change the way IRQs are handed out to PCI devices. 
> > Currently, each I/O APIC pin gets associated with an IRQ, 
> no matter if 
> > the pin is used or not. It is expected that each pin can 
> potentually 
> > be engaged by a device inserted into the corresponding PCI slot. 
> > However, this imposes severe limitation on systems that 
> have designs 
> > that employ many I/O APICs, only utilizing couple lines of 
> each, such 
> > as P64H2 chipset. It is used in ES7000, and currently, 
> there is no way 
> > to boot the system with more that 9 I/O APICs. The simple 
> change below 
> > allows to boot a system with say 64 (or more) I/O APICs, each 
> > providing 1 slot, which otherwise impossible because of the 
> IRQ gaps 
> > created for unused lines on each I/O APIC. It does not resolve the 
> > problem with number of devices that exceeds number of 
> possible IRQs, 
> > but eases up a tension for IRQs on any large system with 
> potentually 
> > large number of devices. I only implemented this for the ACPI boot, 
> > since if the system is this big and
> 
> Can you determine number of slots in use?

I think it is possible, but then it will probably be back to something
like "pci=routeirq" philosophy.
 
> >   using newer chipsets it is probably (better be!) an ACPI based 
> > system :). The change is completely "mechanical" and does not alter 
> > any internal structures or interrupt model/implementation. 
> The patch 
> > works for both i386 and x86_64 archs. It works with MSIs just fine, 
> > and should not intervene with implementations like shared vectors, 
> > when they get worked out and incorporated.
> 
> Well we ran into similar problems on older MPS systems 
> (NUMAQ) but those don't really matter right now anyway. So i 
> think fixing this for ACPI is fine.

ACPI is well organized and easily manipulated, that's why I stopped
right there. I tried adjusting the MPS case, it is possible, but then I
thought no one would need it anyway. It would take multiple changes and
won't be pretty, but if you insist I can work it out :)  
> But i like your patch =)

:)
 
> Thanks,
> 	Zwane
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/