Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc4-V0.7.47-06

[Michal Schmidt]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm attaching a patch which changes a semaphore in cpufreq into a 
> > completion. With this patch, my system runs OK even with cpufreqd.
>
>
> btw., could you please submit this upstream too, so that it doesnt get 
> lost? Semaphore->completion conversions are desirable upstream for cases 
> where the semaphore was in reality not used for mutual exclusion but for 
> completion purposes. (in which case real completions are both more 
> readable and slightly faster)

Yes, I'm going to contact upstream about this.
However, after closer look on cpufreq code I came to a conclusion that 
the lock there doesn't really play the role of a completion. There's 
always: down(), then do something with the data structure, then up() in 
the same function.
I'm going to fix it differently after consulting with upstream author (I 
now think that it should not be necessary to take the lock in 
cpufreq_add_dev at all).

Michal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/