Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

[Denis Vlasenko]

On Wednesday 08 June 2005 04:52, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it 
> > initially caused are now sorted out.
> > 
> > I'd like to:
> > - get a patch into the next -mm that unconditionally enables 4KSTACKS
> > - if there won't be new reports of breakages, send a patch to
> >   completely remove !4KSTACKS for 2.6.13 or 2.6.14
> > 
> > The only drawback is that REISER4_FS does still depend on !4KSTACKS.
> > I told Hans back in March that this has to be changed.
> 
> What about ndiswrapper?
> Why is it so important to make this happen unconditionally?

Number of folks using ndiswrapper for acx100/acx111
while acx team needs help on native driver debugging
worries me.
--
vda

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/