Looks OK and also work on my HW.isn't it safer to swap these last two guys ?? in theory there could be an IRQ betwen pci_save_state() and free_irq()...
Andrew, can you please take this updated version, it is much cleaner and
safer, because it handle the IRQ correctly.
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c 2005-05-27 22:06:00.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c 2005-06-07 16:34:13.641177456 -0400
@@ -1756,11 +1756,19 @@
{
struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
- if (dev && netif_running (dev) && netif_device_present (dev)) {
- netif_device_detach (dev);
- tulip_down (dev);
- /* pci_power_off(pdev, -1); */
- }
+ if (!dev)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (netif_running(dev))
+ tulip_down(dev);
+
+ netif_device_detach(dev);
+ pci_save_state(pdev);
+
+ free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
regards+ pci_disable_device(pdev);
+ pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
+
return 0;
}