Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

[Lee Revell]

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:34:11PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > Midway through the recent "RT patch acceptance" thread, someone mentioned
> > > that it might be good to summarize the various approaches.  The following
> > > is an attempt to do just this, with an eye to providing a reasonable
> > > framework for future discussion.
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?  Errors?  Omissions?
> > 
> > I haven't finished it, but it looks great so far.  Are you planning to
> > repost it to LKML, or otherwise publish it somewhere, after incorporating
> > feedback?
> 
> Glad you like it!
> 
> I figured on sending out an update sometime next week, after incorporating
> feedback.

I believe you are too friendly to vanilla + CONFIG_PREEMPT.  People are
still seeing tens or hundreds of ms bumps.

Does the LTP include an RT latency test yet?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/