Flames go here (was Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance"thread)

[Lee Revell]

On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 00:52 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:37:24PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> > Some of the comments from various folks are just intolerably paranoid
> 
> Just tell me how can you go to a customer and tell him that your
> linux-RTOS has a guaranteed worst case latency of 50usec.  How can you
> tell that? Did you exercise all possible scheduler paths with cache
> disabled and calculated the worst case latency with rdtsc + math?
> 
> Why do you take risks when you can go with much more relaible solutions
> like RTAI and rtlinux?

This thread is converging back to the original "RT patch acceptance"
thread.  I've changed the subject line so people can distinguish the
content from the flames.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/