Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

[hui]

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:05:10AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I don't care what folks did for ages, I care what I think is best to do
> _now_ with linux, and I don't see why one should go with RTOS when much
> simpler and more reliable and _more_performant_ solutions exists when
> switching to linux, even for the printers.

Covered in the previous mega-flame-war RT acceptance thread. 

> Those are sort of problems where metal-hard may be simpler to deal with,
> if there's a skip they'll record a second time, and you can just use
> measurement and proabability there, without providing any guarantee.
> 
> Perhaps you can't handle valid criticism cause you have a conflict of
> interest.

Look, I don't like being pissy with you, but this has already been
covered in that monster thread from hell. Really, it was already covered.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/