Re: hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jun 10 2005 - 23:38:14 EST
* Esben Nielsen <simlo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Depends on the configuration options. If you used the same configs
> they should be the same but if you activated PREEMPT_RT it should slow
> things down due to the overhead of irq-threading and mutexes instead
> of spinlocks - although I am surprised the factor is _that_ big!
one has to make sure the default debug options are disabled.
(DEADLOCK_DETECT, PREEMPT_DEBUG, etc.) But even then there will be
considerable overhead. Until recently, the overhead used to be even
bigger. Note that hackbench is pretty much the worst-case for
PREEMPT_RT: lots of locking and scheduling done and we compare the UP
kernel to the SMP kernel in essence. (in fact PREEMPT_RT's locking is
currently higher overhead than SMP)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/