Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1

[Karim Yaghmour]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, this method should work fine. I suspect you increased the parport 
> IRQ's priority to the maximum on the PREEMPT_RT kernel, correct? Was 
> there any userspace thread on the target system (receiving the parport 
> request and sending the reply), or was it all done in a kernelspace 
> parport driver?

This is all done in kernelspace. I'll check with Kristian for the
rest. In the mean time, let me know if you have any recommendations
based on the fact that it's indeed in the kernel.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/