Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

[Ulrich Drepper]

David Woodhouse wrote:

> Eep -- I hadn't noticed that difference. Will update patch accordingly. 

And change it to expect a 64bit value I hope...


> The other documented difference (other than the signal mask bit) is that
> pselect() is documented not to modify the timeout parameter. I'm not
> sure whether I should preserve that difference, or not.

As long as there is a configuration where the timeout value is not
modified, it doesn't matter.  That is the case for select() using a
personality switch.

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature