Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code

[Chris Wright]

* Serge E. Hallyn (serue@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > You could, of course, add code to act on the
> > integrity measurements you've made, in which
> > case you could be in conformance with the
> > stated eligibilty requirements.
> 
> :)
> 
> IIUC, another (separately implemented) module - whose
> release I'm anxiously awaiting - will actually basically
> be doing that...

At which point we can consider it for LSM inclusion, so let's wait until
then, ok?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/