Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?

[Tobias DiPasquale]

On 6/18/05, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I have just tried upgrading my firewall to 2.6.12, but neither of the following rules in my
> >FORWARD table was allowing return traffic:
> 
> You forget about INPUT and OUTPUT. If you drop everything in INPUT, there's
> nothing to FORWARD.

No. INPUT/OUTPUT rules have nothing to do with FORWARDed traffic,
since a packet is either locally destined (INPUT), locally originated
(OUTPUT) or being forwarded (FORWARD).

> > 1109  814K ACCEPT     all  --  ppp0   br0     anywhere             anywhere         ctstate
> >RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >  11M   13G ACCEPT     all  --  ppp0   br0     anywhere             anywhere         state
> >RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >
> >I have currently returned to using 2.6.11.11, where the identical configuration works fine. br0 is
> >a bridge device containing two e100 devices, and ppp0 is my PPPoE DSL link. I am using iptables
> >1.3.1.

Did you have /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward turned on?

-- 
[ Tobias DiPasquale ]
0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/