Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote:
> I'm seeing the message:
> 
> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> 
> I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using a 
> vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1.  Does this mean the driver 
> has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option?  How 
> bad is "bad"?  Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the message, 
> or what?

can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part