Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

[Hans Reiser]

vs and zam, please comment on what we get from our profiler and spinlock
debugger that the standard tools don't supply.  I am sure you have a
reason, but now is the time to articulate it.

We would like to keep the disabled code in there until we have a chance
to prove (or fail to prove) that cycle detection can be resolved
effectively, and then with a solution in hand argue its merits.

Hans

Andi Kleen wrote:

> Also I'm not sure things like comming with an own profiler
>
>and spinlock debugger are really acceptable. At least this stuff
>should be removed too.
>
>-Andi
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>  
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/