Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2

[Karim Yaghmour]

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> (And, yes, there are other CDFs lacking a 30us bulge that would be
> consistent with a 55us "blue-moon" bulge -- so I guess I am asking
> if you have the CDF or the raw latency measurements -- though the
> data set might be a bit large...  And I would have to think about
> how one goes about deriving individual-latency CDF(s) given a single
> dual-latency CDF, assuming that this is even possible...)

This is a bandwidth issue. The compressed archive containing the
interrupt latencies of all our test runs is 100MB. I could provide
a URL _privately_ to a handful of individuals, but beyond that
someone's going to have to host it.

Let me know if you want this.

Of course, now that LRTBF is out there, others can generate their
own data sets.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/