From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>That works, but seems like "the long way".
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:13:30 -0700
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:59:19PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>Those boxes rely on devfs?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:24:19 -0700
However, this does mean I do need to reinstall a couple
debian boxes here to something newer before I can continue
doing kernel work in 2.6.x on them.
Yeah, when I forget to turn on DEVFS_FS and DEVFS_MOUNT in the
kernel config the machine won't boot. :-)
Can't you just grab the "static dev" debian package and continue on?
I'm sure there is one in there somewhere (don't really know for sure,
not running debian anywhere here, sorry.)
Or how about a tarball of a /dev tree? Would that help you out?
I don't know if Debian has such a package.
Don't worry, I'll take care of this by simply reinstalling
and thus moving to udev.
I think he's just saying that since he did the install with devfs enabled
and has been using devfs device names, a conversion back to 'standard'
names would be a major PITA. It's definately possible to convert, but if
there's not much on the boxes a reinstall might be quicker.