Re: [git patch] urgent e1000 fix
From: David Lang
Date: Thu Jun 23 2005 - 18:22:20 EST
This does not solve the problem that I reported last thursday where the
fourth port of a e1000 quad card doesn't work under SMP (I don't know if
it was supposed to, but since it was a locking fix I had hopes).
here's the symptom I am seeing
happy1-p:~# ifconfig eth11 192.168.255.1
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Invalid argument
happy1-p:~# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
172.20.252.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
10.201.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.201.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
happy1-p:~# ifconfig eth11
eth11 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:B4:BB:97
inet addr:192.168.255.1 Bcast:192.168.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Base address:0x60c0 Memory:fe460000-fe480000
userspace is debian woody
David Lang
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
David Lang wrote:
hmm, I know I'm not that experianced with patch, but when I saved this to a
file and did patch -p1 <file the hunk was rejected, the reject file is
saying
It's probably the whitespace thing that Linus's git-apply gadget was
complaining about.
I'm terribly surprising, though, since my patch(1) applied the diff just
fine.
<shrug>
Jeff
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
-- C.A.R. Hoare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/